Legal Opinion

Peerless Glass Co. v. Pacific Crockery & Tinware Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1898No. L. A. 422PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

Both parties to this case are corporations. Plaintiff alleges a sale of merchandise to defendant of the agreed value of $4,862.62, admits a payment of $1,972.81, leaving a balance of $2,889.81, for which the suit was brought.

Defendant denies that it purchased goods of the value charged in the complaint, but avers that it purchased, or contracted to purchase from plaintiff, fifteen hundred gross of Mason jars, and seventy-six gross of extra caps, of the total value of $7,640.12, and that as part of the contract of sale plaintiff agreed to a rebate of seventy-four cents per hundred pounds, as…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  2. Null v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. Tyra v. CheneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Wexler v. McLucasAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1975
  5. Caldwell v. Western Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API