Legal Opinion

TEC v. Underwood

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 30, 1991No. CA 90-242PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melvin Mayfield, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission.

Appellee Michelle Underwood was employed by TEC, which the opinion of the administrative law judge stated was “a temporary employment company.” On May 21,1987, while on a work assignment at Baldor Electric in Fort Smith, Arkansas, Ms. Underwood suffered an admittedly compensable injury to her lower back. She was paid temporary total disability benefits of $95.81 perweekfromMay21,1987, through July 17,1987, when she was released to go back to work.

At the hearing before the administrative law judge,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. Peabody Testing ServiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Bearden Lumber Co. v. BondCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  3. American Transportation Co. v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  4. Electro-Air v. VillinesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Wright Contracting Co. v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bloom v. Tekton, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Metro Temporaries v. BoydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Patrick v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Department of Parks & Tourism v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Boyd v. Metro TemporariesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API