Legal Opinion

Bloom v. Tekton, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2000No. S-9019PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

0 P I N I 0 N

BRYNER, J justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Allen Bloom appeals the Alaska Workers' Compensation Board's denial of his request to replace his attending physician without the consent of his employer, Tekton, Inc. Bloom maintains that the board's decision contradicts its longstanding policy of permitting injured workers to substitute new attending physicians when the worker's current physician is unable or unwilling to treat. Because the record indicates that Bloom's attending physician refused to treat Bloom, we conclude that the board erred in denying Bloom's request to substitute a new…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Grove v. Alaska Construction & ErectorsAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Municipality of Anchorage v. CarterAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Bockness v. Brown Jug, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Seybert v. Cominco Alaska ExplorationAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Burke v. Houston Nana, L.L.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Veco Alaska, Inc. v. State, Department of Labor, Division of Workers' Compensation, Second Injury FundAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Burke v. HOUSTON NANA, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API