Legal Opinion
Metro Temporaries v. Boyd
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 25, 1993No. 93-197PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
Damon Boyd applied for work with Metro Temporaries. Metro is an agency that assigns its applicants to work on a temporary basis for third party companies. Metro assigned Boyd to work four hours for Didier Nurseries. Boyd accepted the assignment and was injured while working on the job. The sole issue on appeal is the method of determining the amount of weekly disability benefits Boyd is entitled to receive under the applicable Workers’ Compensation statute.
The essential facts are that Boyd applied for work with Metro on March 21, 1990. The next day Metro assigned him…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gill v. Ozark Forest Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- TEC v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
- Mack Coal Company v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Ryan v. NapaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
- Wright v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bloom v. Tekton, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Chapel Gardens Nursery v. LoveladyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
- A & C Services, Inc. v. SowellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
- CRACKER BARREL v. LassiterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
- Joshua Ruffin v. Command Center, Inc. Ace American Insurance Company And Gallagher Bassett ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.