Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PROCEEDING AGAINST McLENDON

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1993No. 1187PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

120 Wn.2d 761 (1993)

845 P.2d 1006

In the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JOHN O. McLENDON, an Attorney at Law.

No. 1187.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 18, 1993.

Hemovich, Nappi, Oreskovich & Butler, by Carl J. Oreskovich and Michael J. Hemovich, for appellant.

Robert D. Welden, for Bar Association.

Dustin Deissner on behalf of the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill, amicus curiae for appellant.

DOLLIVER, J.

John O. McLendon has stipulated to very serious ethical violations including the conversion of client funds. Such conduct mandates disbarment in virtually…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against AllottaWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KumberaWashington Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against TaskerWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against HeardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. In Re Personal Restraint Petition of MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against TaskerWashington Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API