Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Kumbera

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1979No. C.D. 4823PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*402Utter, J.

The respondent, William O. Rumbera, an attorney admitted to practice in this state in 1958, was referred to the Disciplinary Board of the Washington State Bar Association for acts involving misuse of his clients' funds and commingling of his own funds with those of his clients. The board, with two members dissenting, recommended he be suspended from practice for 3 years. He does not contest the findings of fact or conclusions of the disciplinary board, but rather only challenges the recommendation as too severe. We hold the suspension should be for a period of 1 year and that costs,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DeschaneWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against PenningtonWashington Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Disciplinary Proceeding v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against AllottaWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1990

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API