Legal Opinion

In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Tasker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 2000No. 12426-4PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

— Attorney Michael Tasker appeals the determination of the Disciplinary Board of the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) that he be disbarred for various violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC). At issue is whether an attorney who commingles funds in his client trust account and pays business and personal expenses out of the commingled account, but without intent to permanently deprive any clients of money, should be disbarred. We disagree with the WSBA that Tasker be disbarred, and instead impose a two-year suspension from the practice of law.

FACTS

Michael Tasker was an…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Matter of DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against HaskellWashington Supreme Court · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against WhittWashington Supreme Court · 2003

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API