Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Johnson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1990No. 8313PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

— Respondent David F. Johnson, an attorney admitted to the Washington bar, converted $21,051.16 of client trust funds for his personal use. This court on November 3, 1989, ordered Respondent Johnson to show cause why he should not be disbarred. We conclude that David F. Johnson violated specified Rules of Professional Conduct and we rule that he is disbarred, there being insufficient evidence of "extraordinary mitigating circumstances" to justify a lesser sanction.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. David F. Johnson is a graduate of Gonzaga University Law School. He was admitted to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KumberaWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against RentelWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DeschaneWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against EspedalWashington Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Matter of DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API