Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Mayer

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 4, 2005No. 22183-1-IIIPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*698¶1 Jeremy Leland Mayer seeks relief from personal restraint imposed for his 1993 Spokane County conviction upon Alford1 plea of guilty to a single count of second degree murder under both the intentional and felony murder (predicated upon second degree assault) alternatives of the second degree murder statute, RCW 9A.32.050(1)(a) and (b).

Schultheis, J.

¶2 The primary question is whether Mr. Mayer’s conviction must be vacated in light of the Supreme Court’s holding in In re Personal Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn.2d 602, 616, 56 P.3d 981 (2002),. that assault may not serve as the predicate crime…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. CalleWashington Supreme Court · 1995

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. FranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. State v. AmosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. State v. AmosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. State of Washington v. Michael Duke CoombesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API