Legal Opinion

McCallop v. Carberry

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1970No. S. F. 22705PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BURKE, J.

Upon plaintiff’s complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that in violation of due process requirements his wages had been attached prior to judgment and that additional levies were threatened, 1 the trial court issued its order to defendant sheriff to release all moneys held by virtue of prejudgment wage attachment and restraining defendant from any further prejudgment levies on wages. Defendant appeals.

As will appear, we have concluded that the trial court was correct in ruling that California’s prejudgment wage garnishment procedure violates procedural due…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Fahey v. MalloneeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Coe v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Ownbey v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Klim v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
  5. People v. AmorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API