Legal Opinion

Smith v. Krouse

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1978No. 77-1269PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the order of the commission finding appellant to be permanently and totally disabled “but not due to the [prior] allowed injury” constitutes an appealable order.

R. C. 4123.519 provides, in part:

“The claimant or the employer may appeal a decision of the industrial commission in any injury case, other than a decision as to the extent of disability, to the court of common pleas * *

In a series of cases interpreting R. C. 4123.519, it has been held that “* * * it is an order constituting a ‘denial that is absolute going to the basis of claimant’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Campbell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Reeves v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State ex rel. Mansour v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State ex rel. Commercial Motor Freight, Inc. v. StebbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Zavatsky v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Gilbert v. Midland-Ross Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Hospitality Motor Inns, Inc. v. GillespieOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Miraglia v. B. F. Goodrich Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API