Legal Opinion

Hale v. Brown

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 5, 2008No. 97,232PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rosen, J.:

This personal injuxy case comes before the court on review of a decision by the Court of Appeals. The appellant, Mary A. Hale, seeks review of an opinion holding that tire proximate cause doctrine bars her tort action against a driver involved in a one-car accident when another car ran into her car after she slowed down at the scene of the one-car accident. We find as a matter of law that, under the facts of this case, the driver involved in the one-car accident did not proximately cause the succeeding rear-end collision and is therefore not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nero v. Kansas State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. Nungesser v. BryantSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Cullip Ex Rel. Pitts v. Domann Ex Rel. DomannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  4. Esquivel v. WattersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. Deal v. BowmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Puckett v. Mt. Carmel Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. Kuxhausen v. Tillman Partners, L.P.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. Wayman v. Accor North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  4. Castleberry v. DeBrotSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  5. Burnette v. EubanksSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API