Legal Opinion

Deal v. Bowman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 1, 2008No. 96,868PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

This is a personal injury action arising from a collision at a controlled intersection. Trial evidence indicated that the defendant stopped at the stop sign and looked both directions before entering the intersection but nevertheless collided with the plaintiffs car, which he did not see due to glare from the sun. In the district court, the jury found no fault/negligence by either party for the accident. The Court of Appeals reversed, concluding that defendant was negligent as a matter of law. Deal v. Bowman, No. 96,868, unpublished opinion…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nero v. Kansas State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. Sampson v. HuntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Wilkinson v. Shoney's, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. State v. TorresSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  5. Hickert v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. Rhoten v. DicksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. Hale v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  4. Siruta Ex Rel. Heirs at Law of Siruta v. SirutaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. Thomas v. COUNTY COM'RS OF SHAWNEE COUNTYSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API