Legal Opinion

Puckett v. Mt. Carmel Regional Medical Center

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 22, 2010No. 97,971PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

On petition for review, the defendants in this medical malpractice case seek reversal of the Court of Appeals’ determinations that the trial court erred by instructing the jury on intervening cause, the error was not harmless, the jury verdict rendered in the defendants’ favor must be vacated, and the case remanded for retrial. See Puckett v. Mt. Carmel Reg. Med. Center, No. 97,971, unpublished opinion filed September 19, 2008. We affirm the Court of Appeals’ decision, reverse the jury verdict, and remand the case with directions for a new…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Hygh v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. Brown v. KeillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Weymers v. KheraMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Frank Andrews v. Metro North Commuter Railroad Co., Penn Central Corporation, Consolidated Rail Corporation, National Railroad Passenger Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. State v. ReidSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Danko v. ConyersColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. State v. ArnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. Estate of Belden v. Brown CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  4. Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. Wolfe Electric, Inc. v. DuckworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API