Kuxhausen v. Tillman Partners, L.P.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Rosen, J.:
Stacy Lee Kuxhausen seeks review of a decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the district court’s summary judgment order dismissing her personal injury action against Tillman Partners, L.P. See Kuxhausen v. Tillman Partners, 40 Kan. App. 2d 930, 197 P.3d 859 (2009). Kuxhausen contends that the district court (1) should have allowed expert testimony that she suffers from multiple-chemical sensitivity, a controversial diagnosis, as a result of Tillman Partners’ actions and (2) erred in concluding that she had no admissible expert testimony…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. ShaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Rhoten v. DicksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Hale v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. GrimSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Central Natural Resources, Inc. v. Davis Operating Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cynthia Madej v. Jeff MaidenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Siruta Ex Rel. Heirs at Law of Siruta v. SirutaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- In Re the Appeal of LaFarge Midwest/Martin Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- Dunn v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
- Potter v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.