Legal Opinion

Nungesser v. Bryant

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 23, 2007No. 94,176, 94,888PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beier, J.:

This case arises out of an auto accident in which plaintiff Jimmy L. Nungesser was seriously injured. It requires us to consider whether Kansas law permitted defendant Josh M. Bryant to pursue an action alleging negligent or bad faith failure to settle by his insurer, EMCASCO Insurance Company (EMCASCO), before his liability on Nungesser’s personal injury claim had been established.

The district court permitted Bryant’s claim against EMCASCO to go forward, and EMCASCO now appeals the determination that it must pay a $2 million consent judgment…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Glenn v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  3. Vest v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. Scroggins v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Bollinger v. NussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Waste Connections of Kansas, Inc. v. Ritchie Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. State v. SharpSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. Frazier v. GoudschaalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. Kelly v. VinzantSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. Hale v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API