Sidberry v. Koch
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILTON POLLACK, District Judge.
The plaintiffs have moved for a preliminary injunction to restrain the defendants from putting into effect rent increases imposed upon the plaintiffs pursuant to the City’s rent restructuring program for in rem housing. 1 Defendants have cross-moved for dismissal of the complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) or for summary judgment dismissing the complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Three tenants and tenant associations have moved to intervene pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 24. For the reasons stated hereafter, the motion to intervene will be denied,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States Postal Service v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Daniel Burr v. The New Rochelle Municipal Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
3Cited by9 opinions
- McNeill v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Cook v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Mott v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Laureano v. KochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Johnson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.