Legal Opinion

Laureano v. Koch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alexander, J.

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, commenced by the tenants of four buildings acquired by the City of New York pursuant to in rem tax foreclosures,1 Special Term concluded that the determination of the respondent-appellant, New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) increasing the rents of said tenants effective February 1, 1982, was arbitrary, unreasonable, administratively unlawful and constitutionally infirm; annulled the determination and permanently enjoined HPD from collecting the increases (116 Misc 2d 287). Additionally,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Sidberry v. KochDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  3. Laureano v. KochNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Acme Folding Box Co. v. Finance AdministrationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allerton Coops Tenants Ass'n v. BidermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Union of City Tenants v. KochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Bryant Avenue Tenants' Ass'n v. KochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Johnson v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Holman v. Goldome BankNew York Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API