Mott v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Goldstein, J.
At issue here is whether rents subsidized under 42 USC § 1437f (section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended) are subject to regulation under the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974 (hereinafter the ETPA [McKinney’s Uncons Laws of NY § 8621 et seq.; L 1974, ch 576, § 4, as amended]). We hold that, barring certain exceptions not applicable here, such rents are subject to regulation under the ETPA.
1. Facts
On March 1, 1987, the tenant signed a lease with the petitioner landlord for the subject apartment at a rent of $600 per month. On March…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Malone v. White Motor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Building & Construction Trades Council of the Metropolitan District v. Associated Builders & Contractors of Massachusetts/Rhode Island, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Brown v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union Local 54Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- 17th Holding LLC v. RiveraAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2002
- Rosario v. Diagonal Realty, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2005
- Kolomick v. New York Air National GuardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Citadel Estates, LLC v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 2013
- Seminara Pelham, LLC v. FormisanoNew Rochelle City Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.