Legal Opinion
State v. Nieves
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided May 6, 2010No. 2009-402PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The defendant, Soiluis Nieves, was charged with possession
of a controlled drug with intent to sell and conspiracy to commit sale of a controlled drug. See RSA 318-B:2 (Supp. 2008); RSA 629:3 (2007). The State appeals an order of the Superior Court (Hicks, J.) granting the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement. We reverse and remand.
The following facts were found by the trial court in its order on the defendant’s motion to suppress. In April 2008, Detective Kevin Rourke of *246the Nashua Police Department worked with a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. JuliusWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. OrdeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. BellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- State v. Daniel Jesus CoraSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- State v. Sean F. StaceySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- State v. Jonathan FoldsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.