Legal Opinion

Horton v. California

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 4, 1990No. 88-7164PublishedCited by 2,544 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

In this case we revisit an issue that was considered, but not conclusively resolved, in Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443 (1971): Whether the warrantless seizure of evidence of crime in plain view is prohibited by the Fourth Amendment if the discovery of the evidence was not inadvertent. We conclude that even though inadvertence is a characteristic of most legitimate “plain-view” seizures, it is not a necessary condition.

I

Petitioner was convicted of the armed robbery of Erwin Wallaker, the treasurer of the San Jose Coin Club. When Wallaker returned to his home after the Club’s annual…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,544 opinions

  1. Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Devenpeck v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Soldal v. Cook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

2,539 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API