Legal Opinion

State v. Bell

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 21, 2012No. 2011-461PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHlCKS, J.

The defendant, Elliott M. Bell, appeals a decision of the Superior Court (Brown, J.) denying his motion to suppress evidence that he possessed less than one ounce of the controlled drug “ecstasy.” See RSA 318-B:2 (2011) (amended 2011). We affirm.

I

The following facts are drawn from the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s motion to suppress, or are otherwise undisputed. On July 28, 2010, Dover Police Officers Matthew Boc and Paul Levin investigated a noise complaint at an apartment building in Dover. With the complainant’s help, they traced the sound to one apartment and knocked on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. United States v. Cruz CorralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. State v. McKinnon-AndrewsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Daniel Jesus CoraSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  2. State v. DaltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  3. State v. MercierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  4. State v. Jonathan FoldsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
  5. State v. Meghan SageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API