Legal Opinion
Bair v. City of Atlantic City
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 6, 2000No. Civil 99-5232(JBS), 99-5233(JBS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KUGLER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs Erika Bair and Sandra Taylor move, in these companion cases, 1 to amend their complaints to withdraw their Title VII claims and substitute claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, based on the same conduct and occurrences that formed the basis for their Title VII claims. Defendant City of Atlantic City opposes the motions to amend and cross-moves to dismiss the complaints in their entirety. For the following reasons, plaintiffs’ motions to amend are granted, and defendant’s cross-motions to dismiss are dismissed.
I. FACTUAL and PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Arista Records, Inc. v. Flea World, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Marion v. City of Philadelphia/Water DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Koch Materials Co. v. Shore Slurry Seal, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- BLACKBOOK CAPITAL INC v. THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. DUBOISDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.