Legal Opinion
Koch Materials Co. v. Shore Slurry Seal, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 14, 2003No. Civil Action No. 01-2059PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORLOFSKY, District Judge.
Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, Koch Materials Company (“Koch”), appeals the Order of Magistrate Judge Joel B. Rosen dated December 6, 2002, which granted the *303motion to amend the counterclaim of Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff, Shore Slurry Seal, Inc. (“Shore Slurry”). For the reasons set forth below, I conclude that Judge Rosen’s decision was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Accordingly, Judge Rosen’s Deeember 6, 2002 Order shall be affirmed.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The detailed factual background in the saga that this case has…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Stanford Shane Otis Terrell Robert Stewart v. William Fauver, Commissioner James Barbo, Administrator Rogers, Chief Director of CustodyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- ROSS v. FORSTER, GARBUS & GARBUSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023