Legal Opinion
Plows v. Rockwell Collins, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 9, 2011No. Case SACV 10-01936 DOC (MANx)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROCEEDING (IN CHAMBERS): DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.
Before the Court are two Motions to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or, In the Alternative, Stay Proceedings filed by Defendant Rockwell Collins, Inc. in the above-captioned case (“Motions to Compel Arbitration”) (Docket 29, 30). The court finds these matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. After reviewing the moving, opposing and replying papers, the Court DENIES the Motions to Compel Arbitration in part and ORDERS further discovery on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Paige Martin v. Gary YasudaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Carmax Auto Superstores California LLC v. HernandezDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Truly Nolen of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Lewis v. UBS Financial Services Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Avilez v. Pinkerton Government ServicesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.