Legal Opinion
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Bernard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 14, 1995No. C9-85-1621PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This matter is before the court upon petition by the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility against respondent, William N. Bernard, asserting that respondent committed unprofessional conduct in altering a fully-executed deed and recording it. We hold that respondent’s misconduct warrants temporary suspension from the practice of law.
The basic facts of this case are undisputed. Respondent was admitted to practice in Minnesota on June 3, 1964. He is currently a sole practitioner in Willmar, Minnesota.
In March 1993, T.G. was living in a house she leased from Jerome…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RuffenachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Matter of Disciplinary Action Against FrankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re the Disciplinary Action Against JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against GettySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against CuttingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- In re Disciplinary Action Against FettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HoedemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001