State v. Johnson
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The principal issues to be decided in this case are (1) whether the evidence presented sufficed to convict the defendant and (2) what remedy should be given on appeal where the court renders a judgment of conviction of both a crime and a lesser included offense and imposes a separate sentence on both.
*736On October 25, 2010, in the judicial district of Anso-nia-Milford, a jury found the defendant, Jennifer Johnson, guilty of conspiracy to commit possession of narcotics with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes §§ 21a-277 (a) and 53a-48 (a); possession of narcotics in…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pennekamp v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. LeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. MirandaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. DawsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- State v. ArokiumConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. DawsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.