Legal Opinion
In Re Condemnation by the Redevelopment Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 30, 1980No. Appeal, 18 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
The appellants, Abraham and Minnie . Miller, seek review of an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County which sustained preliminary objections filed by the Redevelopment Authority of the -City of Bethlehem (Authority) in opposition to the appellants’ petition for an appointment of viewers. Their petition had alleged a de facto condemnation of their property by the Authority.
In January of 1972, the City of Bethlehem and the Authority instituted a redevelopment project known as Northside Urban Renewal Area No. 1 and the appellants were notified that their…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Conroy-Prugh Glass Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- In re RamseyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- In re Cornell Industrial Electric Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- County of Allegheny v. Church of Jesus ChristCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- In re a Condemnation in fact and displacement by CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Balent v. City of Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- McGaffic v. RED. AUTH., CITY OF N. CASTLECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- In re 1301 Filbert Ltd. PartnershipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Genter v. Blair County Convention and Sports Facilities AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Visco v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.