Legal Opinion
Urbanic v. Rosenfeld
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 4, 1993No. 1934, 1935, 1972 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a consolidated appeal filed by Darwin Rosenfeld, Claire Rosenfeld and Todd Rosenfeld (collectively, the Rosenfelds) and the Borough of Churchill (Borough) from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, entering judgment in favor of John M. Urbanic (Urbanic) and awarding him compensatory damages against both the Rosenfelds and the Borough and punitive damages against the Rosenfelds only for violations of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The Urbanics and the Rosenfelds live a few houses away from each other on Garrick Drive, Borough of Churchill, Pennsylvania.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Balent v. City of Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Jae v. GoodCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Heinly v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Monaci v. State Horse Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of O'HaraCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.