Legal Opinion
Arcadia Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 1979No. 78-1121PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
E. C. 4905.26, 4905.22 and 4905.381 authorize the commission to order telephone companies under its jurisdiction to establish Extended Area Service (EAS). See Ohio Central Telephone Corp. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1957), 166 Ohio St. 180. As indicated earlier, the considerations that are weighed in coming to a final decision concerning the propriety of EAS are set forth in Chapter 4901 :l-7, Ohio Adm. Code.2
*183The appellant has raised a sole proposition of law directed at the rates to be charged under the commission order, which reads: “The public utilities commission may not provide a new and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- West Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Boone County Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. Public Service CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- New York Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Baltimore Transit Co. v. HesseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- General Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by5 opinions
- Norman v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- City of Norwalk v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Morrow Chamber of Commerce v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Morrow Chamber of Commerce v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- Wadsworth v. GTE North Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993