Legal Opinion

Norman v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1980No. Nos. 79-475 and 79-486PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C. J.

Although the opinion and order of the Public Utilities Commission herein is written in terms of the specific parties before the commission, we determine that it must constitute statements of rate and charge policy. The commission is not a collection agency, but rather an overseer of the rates and charges of a utility as they apply to the utility’s customers in general. We interpret the commission’s order to hold that in cases of residential customers and in those cases where a commercial customer can show excusable ignorance of the fact his bills are abnormally low, there shall be a one-year…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arcadia Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Joseph Chevrolet Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. In re Complaint of Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co., Inc. v. Ohio Edison Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API