Morrow Chamber of Commerce v. Public Utilities Commission

As their first proposition of law, appellants argue that the commission’s denial of flat-rate EAS between the Morrow and Cincinnati exchanges is against the manifest weight of the evidence. In the alternative, they argue that the commission erred by not ordering United to retain Econo-Call service upon the implementation of measured-rate EAS. For the reasons which follow, we reject appellants’ arguments and affirm the commission’s order.

I

As indicated above, Ohio Adm.Code 4901:1-7-04 sets forth the guidelines which the commission is to consider in making its determination as to the adequacy of…