Legal Opinion

City of Norwalk v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1982No. 81-1690PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This court has perviously stated that “ ‘[e]xtended-area telephone service’ * * * is that type of service in which a subscriber of one telephone exchange may call a subscriber of another exchange without being required to pay a separate charge therefor.” Ohio Central Telephone Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1957), 166 Ohio St. 180 [1 O.O.2d 564], paragraph one of *108the syllabus. Further, pursuant to R.C. 4905.22, 4905.26, and 4905.381, the commission is authorized “to order telephone companies under its jurisdiction to establish Extended Area Service * * Arcadia Tel. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1979),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Toledo Coalition for Safe Energy v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Arcadia Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wadsworth v. GTE North Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API