Legal Opinion
United States v. Buckles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 2, 2011No. 08-36031PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Federal prisoner Morris Buckles appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion as untimely. Buckles argues that our order recalling the mandate so that we could consider his motion for appointment of certiorari counsel restarted the clock for the 90-day period within which he was required to petition the Supreme Court for certiorari review of his conviction on direct appeal. If our order restarted the clock, Buckles’s petition for certiorari was timely. If the petition was timely, his subsequent § 2255 motion was timely as well.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Rudin v. MylesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Byron McDadeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Derrick WheatenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Troy Lambert v. Nutraceutical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Fidel Castro-VerdugoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.