United States v. Fidel Castro-Verdugo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Fidel Castro-Verdugo was convicted of illegal reentry in 2011. At sentencing, the district court imposed a period of probation along with a stayed custodial sentence, thereby exceeding the court’s authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3561(a)(3). In 2013, Defendant again was convicted of illegal reentry which, in addition to constituting a new crime, violated the conditions of his 2011 sentence of probation. On appeal from the probation revocation proceedings, Defendant argues that the district court in 2013 lacked jurisdiction because of the defect in the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Baltazar Hernandez Barron Margarita Hernandez Ramirez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rafael Guerrero-Sanchez v. Warden York County PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Peter PocklingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Peter PocklingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Ryan CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.