Legal Opinion
Sony Electronics, Inc. v. Soundview Technologies, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 28, 2005No. 3:00CV754(JBA)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruling Awarding Sharp Electronics Corporation Attorneys Fees
ARTERTON, District Judge.
On July 12, 2005, this Court granted in part the Non-Soundview Parties’ 1 Motion for Attorneys Fees [Doc. # 473], awarding attorneys fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927. See Ruling on Motion for Attorneys Fees [Doc. # 506], at 23. The Court directed the non-Soundview parties to submit their claim for reasonable fees and costs and supporting documentation within 30 days, with Soundview’s response due 21 days thereafter. See id. Subsequent to the Court’s ruling, Mitsubishi Digital Electronics America…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Webb v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Luciano v. Olsten Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- A.R. ex rel. R.V. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hamilton v. Boise Cascade ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Dixon v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
- Serricchio v. Wachovia Securities, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- M.K. Ex Rel. K. v. SergiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Benjamin v. Oxford Health Ins., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.