Legal Opinion
Kirsch v. Fleet Street, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 25, 1998No. Docket Nos. 96-9631, 97-7021PublishedCited by 241 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEARSE, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Daniel Kirsch, who prevailed before a jury on his claim against defendants Fleet Street, Ltd. (“Fleet Street” or the “company”), et al., for constructively -terminating his employment in willful violation of the Age Diserimination in Employment Act (“ADEA” or the “Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. (1994), appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Dominick L. DiCarlo, Judge **, awarding him $190,000 in double damages, plus interest and attorneys’ fees, following a second trial on damages after Kirsch’s…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by241 opinions
- Lore v. City of SyracuseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Lisa Petrosino v. Bell AtlanticCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Goldberger v. Integrated Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Gierlinger v. GleasonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Brown v. Alabama Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
236 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.