Legal Opinion
Fabri v. UNITED TECHS. INT'L., INC.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 29, 2002No. CIV. 3:96CV2358(PCD)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
DORSEY, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs move for attorneys’ fees under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUTPA”). The motion is denied without prejudice.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
Plaintiffs, Juan F. Fabri, Sr. and Juan F. Fabri, Jr. (collectively, “Fabris”), are Argentine citizens. Pursuant to written agreements (the “SRA”), they served as sales representative for divisions and subsidiaries of United Technologies Corporation, including United Technologies International and Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (collectively,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Locascio v. Imports Unlimited, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Charts v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Murillo v. A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Negron v. Patriot Auto Sales, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019