People v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChin, J.
*396 *303 Real party in interest, Pablo Ullisses Lara, Jr. (hereafter, defendant), was charged in criminal (or adult) court with sex crimes allegedly committed in 2014 and 2015 when he was 14 and 15 years old. The law then in effect permitted the prosecutor to charge the case directly in adult court. In November 2016, after the charges were filed, the electorate passed Proposition 57, the "Public Safety and Rehabilitation Act of 2016" (Proposition **24 57). Proposition 57 prohibits prosecutors from charging juveniles with crimes directly in adult court. Instead, they must commence the action in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Tapia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by231 opinions
- People v. Martinez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. FrahsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. StampsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. Garcia, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Anthony, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
226 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.