Meyer v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 41037. [Oral argument Rob. 13,1918, by Mr. Hampton and Mr. IXanson.]
1Opinion of the CourtMoNtgomerv, Presiding Judge
The protest in its essential statements was:
Protest is hereby made against your decision assessing duty on the value of §48 gold, United States, instead of $48 Mexican, on curios, and on other merchandise, covered by entries named below. The ground of objection under the tariff act of October 3, 1913, is that said merchandise was purchased at the total price of $48, Mexican, and was paid for at this rate to the Chinese merchant; that is to say, it was bought and paid for in silver arid not in gold United States dollars. The amount of duty therefore should be ascertained by multiplying the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. WymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. Swedish Produce Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. Proctor CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Ullman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- United States v. Nozaki Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Balbach Smelting & Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921