Legal Opinion

Cockcroft v. Kirkland

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 10, 2008No. C 05-1080 MHP (pr)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN LIMITED PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Peter T. Cockcroft, formerly an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants have moved to dismiss the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) and 12(b)(6). Cockcroft has opposed the motion. The motion will be granted in part and denied in part. The case also will be referred for appointment of counsel.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs amended complaint is the operative pleading and alleged the following: Cockcroft was housed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. (PC) Armstrong v. County of PlumasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  2. (PC) Asberry v. BiterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  3. (PC) Evans v. MilamDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (PC) Rayford v. ShermanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (PC) Sekona v. FrancisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API