(PC) Armstrong v. County of Plumas
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC ARMSTRONG, No. 2:25-cv-0904 SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF PLUMAS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is incarcerated in Plumas County Jail and proceeding pro se with a civil rights 18 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint is before the undersigned for screening 19 under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff has also filed a motion to proceed in forma 20 pauperis (ECF No. 2) and motions for the appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 3, 7). 21 IN FORMA PAUPERIS 22…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.