Legal Opinion

(PC) Armstrong v. County of Plumas

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 28, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00904Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC ARMSTRONG, No. 2:25-cv-0904 SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF PLUMAS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is incarcerated in Plumas County Jail and proceeding pro se with a civil rights 18 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint is before the undersigned for screening 19 under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff has also filed a motion to proceed in forma 20 pauperis (ECF No. 2) and motions for the appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 3, 7). 21 IN FORMA PAUPERIS 22…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API