Legal Opinion
(PC) Rayford v. Sherman
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 28, 2021No. 1:19-cv-00225Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EUGENE RAYFORD, 1:19-cv-00225-AWI-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDINGS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE 13 vs. PROCEED WITH PLAINTIFF’S EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIMS AGAINST 14 SHERMAN, et al., DEFENDANTS SHERMAN AND MILAM, AND THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND 15 DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED FROM THIS Defendants. CASE BASED ON PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO 16 STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 24.) 17 OBJECTIONS DUE IN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS 18 19 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 Eugene Rayford (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.