Legal Opinion
MacLean v. State Dept. of Educ.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 27, 1999No. 2 CA-CV 99-0102PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Plaintiff/appellant Diane MaeLean worked for the Arizona Department of Education (the Department) from December 1994 to January 1996. After resigning from her job, she sued the state, alleging that she had a “disability” covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990(ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, and that the Department had violated the ADA by failing to provide her with reasonable accommodation and by retaliating against her for engaging in a protected activity, resulting in a constructive discharge.
¶2 The trial court granted the state’s motion…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Krouse v. American Sterilizer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Vivian J. Smart v. Ball State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Day v. LSI Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2016
- Allstate Indemnity Co. v. RidgelyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Najar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- City of Bisbee v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Doepke-Kline v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.