Legal Opinion
City of Bisbee v. Arizona Water Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 8, 2007No. 2 CA-CV 2006-0106PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 In this quo warranto and declaratory relief action, the trial court granted partial summary judgment in favor of appellee, the City of Bisbee, and against appellant, the Arizona Water Company (“AWC”). AWC appeals from the ensuing judgment, entered pursuant to Rules 54(b) and 56, Ariz. R. Civ. P., 16 A.R.S., Pt. 2. On appeal, AWC argues, inter aha, the Arizona Corporation Commission had exclusive jurisdiction of the issues presented and the trial court erred in granting partial summary judgment in favor of the City. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
BACKGRO…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Hawkins v. State, Dept. of Economic SEC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Qwest Corp. v. City of ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- City of Chandler v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Sonoran Peaks, LLC v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Pure Wafer, Inc. v. City of PrescottDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014