Legal Opinion
Najar v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 31, 2000No. 2 CA-CV 98-0229PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 The state appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff/appellee Cynthia Najar, and its denial of a new trial, on her claim that the state unlawfully denied her a promotion in retaliation for her actions in filing a sexual harassment grievance against her former supervisor. Because Na-jar did not show, nor did the trial court find, any retaliatory motivation or intent in the decision not to promote her, we reverse the judgment but remand for further proceedings on other retaliation issues the trial court did not reach.
Facts and Procedural…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Krouse v. American Sterilizer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Fayette Long Jeanell Reavis v. Eastfield CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Gertie Simmons and Thomas Baker v. Camden County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Gaye Levy AYON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arthur F. SAMPSON, Administrator, General Services Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Whitmire v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2019
- Gerberry v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Michael Burroughs v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Whitehead v. Grand Canyon UniversityDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Williams v. Landry's IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025