Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Finney

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1983No. 8223SC1029 and 8321SC336PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

G.S. 18A-8, in effect at the time of both actions, makes it a crime for any person, firm or corporation knowingly to sell or give malt beverages or unfortified wine to any person under eighteen years of age. Violation of such statute is a misdemeanor. G.S. 18A-56. There is no question that defendants in both actions violated the statute; the question before this Court is whether defendants can be subjected to civil liability for automobile accidents caused by the negligence of intoxicated minors who purchased malt beverages from defendants. For the reasons set forth below,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Trail v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Garcia v. HargroveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Fuel Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Matthews v. KoniecznySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Tomlinson v. Love's Country Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Mansfield v. Circle K. Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Hinegardner v. Marcor Resorts, L.P.Nevada Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API