Garcia v. Hargrove
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.
The issue on this appeal is whether this court is now going to abrogate the common-law rule that it is not a tort to sell intoxicating liquor to able-bodied men, reverse prior case law of this court founded on this rule, and now hold that a seller of intoxicating liquor can be found liable, under principles of common-law negligence. We look upon .this as a policy decision and we are not persuaded to reverse the position previously taken by this court.
The common-law rule referred to is set forth in 48 C. J. S., Intoxicating Liquors, p. 716, sec. 430:
“At common law, and apart from statute, no…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Morningstar v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- Lopez Ex Rel. Lopez v. MaezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- McClellan v. TottenhoffWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Craig v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.