Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Hargrove

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1970No. 205PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

The issue on this appeal is whether this court is now going to abrogate the common-law rule that it is not a tort to sell intoxicating liquor to able-bodied men, reverse prior case law of this court founded on this rule, and now hold that a seller of intoxicating liquor can be found liable, under principles of common-law negligence. We look upon .this as a policy decision and we are not persuaded to reverse the position previously taken by this court.

The common-law rule referred to is set forth in 48 C. J. S., Intoxicating Liquors, p. 716, sec. 430:

“At common law, and apart from statute, no…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Morningstar v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Lopez Ex Rel. Lopez v. MaezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  4. McClellan v. TottenhoffWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Craig v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API