Legal Opinion

Riddock v. City of Helena

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1984No. 84-056PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

Walter R. Riddock filed a complaint in Lewis and Clark County District Court alleging that the City of Helena had constructed a pipeline across the land of his predecessors in interest without permission or payment of compensation. Riddock, as present owner of the land, seeks compensation for the alleged taking and recovery of the value of the City’s use since installation of the pipeline, or, in the alternative, an order requiring the City to remove the pipeline. The District Court granted summary judgment in the City’s favor and Riddock appeals. We affirm.

The issues are:

1. May plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'CONNOR v. BrodieMontana Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Wickwire v. City & Borough of JuneauAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Brazil v. City of AuburnWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. PortmannMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Garrett v. JacksonMontana Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Graham v. MacKMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hoover v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  3. City of Missoula v. Mountain Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Weidner v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. City of Virginia Beach v. BellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API