State v. Portmann
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle
This is an action by the State of Montana to remove alleged encroachments and obstructions from a public road. Error is specified in the findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the judge of the 18th Judicial District, sitting without a jury, which were generally favorable to the defendant, Martin E. Portmann. Because of their mutuality of interests the plaintiff, State of Montana, and the defendants, Trevor S. and Eleanor H. Povah (husband and wife), jointly perfected this appeal.
Respondent Portmann (hereinafter called Portmann) owns the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ferguson v. StandleyMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- City of Butte v. MikosowitzMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- State Ex Rel. Game, Forestation & Parks Commission v. HullNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Babcock v. GreggMontana Supreme Court · 1918
- Descheemaeker v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Warnack v. Coneen Family TrustMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- Kelly v. WallaceMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- O'CONNOR v. BrodieMontana Supreme Court · 1969
- Wohl v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Barfnecht v. Town Board of Hollywood TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.